A leader using a coerced power base relies primarily on:

A leader using a coerced power base relies primarily on:

• A. Influencing followers through admiration
• B. Punishing or threatening to punish group members
• C. Providing rewards for accomplishments
• D. Offering expert guidance based on their knowledge

Answer: (B)

A leader who utilizes a coerced power base primarily relies on punishment or the threat of punishment to influence and control group members. This form of power is rooted in the ability to impose consequences for undesirable behavior or to create fear of negative outcomes if certain demands are not met. In this context, the leader may leverage their authority to enforce compliance or obedience by indicating that failure to adhere to group norms, meet expectations, or follow directives could result in disciplinary action, such as demotion, critical evaluations, or even expulsion from the group. This creates an environment where followers may act not out of respect or admiration for the leader but to avoid the repercussions associated with noncompliance. The alternative options suggest different forms of influence, such as admiration and rewards, which align more closely with referent power and reward power, respectively. These styles foster positive relationships and cooperation rather than instilling fear. Offering expert guidance is indicative of expert power, where influence stems from one's knowledge, competence, or skills, promoting trust and followership based on respect.

A leader who utilizes a coerced power base primarily relies on punishment or the threat of punishment to influence and control group members. This form of power is rooted in the ability to impose consequences for undesirable behavior or to create fear of negative outcomes if certain demands are not met.

In this context, the leader may leverage their authority to enforce compliance or obedience by indicating that failure to adhere to group norms, meet expectations, or follow directives could result in disciplinary action, such as demotion, critical evaluations, or even expulsion from the group. This creates an environment where followers may act not out of respect or admiration for the leader but to avoid the repercussions associated with noncompliance.

The alternative options suggest different forms of influence, such as admiration and rewards, which align more closely with referent power and reward power, respectively. These styles foster positive relationships and cooperation rather than instilling fear. Offering expert guidance is indicative of expert power, where influence stems from one's knowledge, competence, or skills, promoting trust and followership based on respect.